| Electrode porosity | Approximately 35–50% for many coated lithium-ion electrodes | Often reduced to approximately 20–40%, depending on chemistry and loading | Improves volumetric energy density by allowing more active material in a given cell volume | Excessive reduction limits electrolyte penetration and slows lithium-ion transport |
| Compacted electrode density | Graphite anodes commonly fall near 1.2–1.6 g/cm³; layered-oxide cathodes commonly near 2.2–3.0 g/cm³ | Graphite anodes commonly near 1.4–1.8 g/cm³; layered-oxide cathodes commonly near 2.8–3.6 g/cm³ | Increases volumetric capacity and supports more compact cell designs | Very high density can reduce rate capability and increase mechanical stress within the coating |
| Electronic contact between particles | Particle-to-particle contacts may be incomplete or non-uniform | Improved contact between active material, conductive additive, and current collector | Usually lowers electronic resistance and improves power capability | Over-compression may deform particles or damage conductive pathways |
| Electrode thickness and areal loading | Greater thickness and lower packing efficiency after coating and drying | Reduced thickness at the same mass loading and more uniform coating profile | Improves dimensional consistency and increases energy stored per unit cell volume | Non-uniform pressure can produce local density variations and uneven current distribution |
| Electrolyte wetting | Larger interconnected pores generally support faster electrolyte infiltration | Smaller and less connected pores require more careful wetting and formation control | Moderate compaction can improve electrode uniformity after wetting | Insufficient wetting can increase impedance, prolong formation, and create inactive regions |
| Internal resistance | Higher contact resistance may result from incomplete particle and collector contact | Moderate calendering generally decreases electronic contact resistance | Supports higher discharge power and reduces voltage drop under load | Excessive densification can increase ionic resistance, offsetting electronic gains |
| High-rate charge and discharge | Good ion access but less efficient electronic pathways | Balanced compaction can improve power; excessive compaction restricts ion movement | A controlled porosity gradient can balance energy density and fast-charge capability | Low porosity increases concentration polarization and reduces usable capacity at high current |
| Cycle life and mechanical stability | Higher pore volume may permit movement but can lead to less uniform stress distribution | Moderate compaction improves particle contact and coating integrity | Can reduce local resistance growth and improve consistency during cycling | Excessive pressure may cause particle cracking, binder displacement, or coating delamination |
| Fast-charge safety | More pore volume can support ion transport but may reduce volumetric efficiency | Optimized compaction provides a compromise between energy density and transport | Properly controlled electrodes reduce non-uniform current hotspots | Over-calendered graphite anodes can increase polarization and raise the risk of lithium plating during fast charging |
| Thermal behavior | Lower density may produce higher resistance and localized heating under heavy load | Reduced electronic resistance can lower some heat-generation components | More uniform current distribution can improve thermal consistency | Restricted ion transport can increase polarization and heat generation during high-current operation |
| Manufacturing consistency | Thickness, density, and surface roughness can vary after coating and drying | More consistent thickness, density, and surface finish when roll pressure and gap are controlled | Improves cell-to-cell uniformity, yield, and predictable formation behavior | Incorrect roll alignment or excessive pressure can create edge cracking, wrinkling, and thickness gradients |